|
|
The Kestrel could just as well have been designed as a size 4 plane, and I revile designs that are simply sub-optimal without reason. At he same time, the plane is huge, so size 3 seems reasonable. I put it down to the agility given by the special design.
Name
|
Kestrel
|
| Base Target Number |
4 |
| Speed |
3 |
| G-rating |
2 |
| Acceleration |
3 |
|
|
| Gun 1 |
60 |
| Gun 2 |
60 |
| Gun 3 |
60 |
| Gun 4 |
|
| Gun 5 |
30 |
| Gun 6 |
40 |
| Gun 7 |
40 |
| Gun 8 |
30 |
|
|
| Armor: |
250 |
|
|
40/50/40 |
|
|
40/40/40 |
|
|
| Free Weight |
10 |
Design
Included here is l as a list of the relevant Special Characteristics of the plane, a design complexity, and a price calculated from these values.
| Base Complexity |
|
17 |
| Multiple Engines (2) |
|
+1 |
| High Service Ceiling |
|
+1 |
| Pitel Mount Guns (2) |
|
+2 |
| Superior Engine |
|
+1 |
|
| Total |
|
22 |
|
|
|
| Cost |
$12.400 |
|
 |
|
