Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fox in the Dark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* '''Whatever happened to bullet-proof? ''' When successfully resisting consequences, the position the consequence is based on improves by two steps. This includes harm. A deadly consequence becomes a controlled consequence, risky and controlled consequences are completely negated. ''This lessens the difference between harm and other consequences, and makes deadly position more dangerous.''' Page 32. | * '''Whatever happened to bullet-proof? ''' When successfully resisting consequences, the position the consequence is based on improves by two steps. This includes harm. A deadly consequence becomes a controlled consequence, risky and controlled consequences are completely negated. ''This lessens the difference between harm and other consequences, and makes deadly position more dangerous.''' Page 32. | ||
| + | == Possible Playbooks == | ||
# '''[[Inquisitors (FiD)|Inquisitors]]''' | # '''[[Inquisitors (FiD)|Inquisitors]]''' | ||
# '''[[Trackers (FiD)|Trackers ]]''' | # '''[[Trackers (FiD)|Trackers ]]''' | ||
| + | # Troubadour | ||
| + | # Craftsman | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 3 October 2024
- Whatever happened to bullet-proof? When successfully resisting consequences, the position the consequence is based on improves by two steps. This includes harm. A deadly consequence becomes a controlled consequence, risky and controlled consequences are completely negated. This lessens the difference between harm and other consequences, and makes deadly position more dangerous.' Page 32.
Possible Playbooks
- Inquisitors
- Trackers
- Troubadour
- Craftsman